SBIR, IES, NSF, AfWerx, NIH. We find you money or analyze your task orders.
We match the opportunity with researchers across our Higher Education network.
We find University Presidents, General Officers, Field Grade Officers, and C Suite Executives to serve your team.
We craft a winning narrative with a CTA of, "Give me your money."
Utlizing market research, academic journals, and agile methods we craft a budget plan based in science.
You can't write. Your team can't write. Stop pouring overhead down the drain. Nobody has a more talented bench of writers. It is why we team up with Higher Education.
We need to connect observed evidence to appropriate indicators. We have research validateds program tools that measure alignment to any framework or rubric.
Our program evaluators use a preponderance of both qualitative and quantitative evidence aligned to program goals, objevtives, and indicators.
Instructional capacity increases when teachers get actionable feedback based on best pedagogical practices.Our porgram evaluators help you grow through the Claim, Connect, Action method to ensure trainers focus on meaningful student engagement and learning.
When Principal Investigators and program managers receive feedback for growth directly connected to your indicators instructional capacity grows. The ReVIEW Talent Feedback System puts the focus on coaching and development not tagging of evidence.
We all have different lenses. The ReVIEW Talent Feedback System helps Principal Investigators and program managers recognize their bias and provide the most objective feedback possible.
Our system trains teachers to write effective feedback reports that are evidence driven. Using the Claim, Connect, Action method Principal Investigators and program managers learn to make claims based on a framework, connect that claim to observed evidence, and then recommend actionable feedback.